|
|
Lamentation of Christ
pencil
Gordon Napier
The placement of the nails is an issue of pedantic debatable. The Bible
does state that Jesus's wounds were in his hand, and not wrist (John 20:
25-6). The hands and feet could have taken the weight especially if there
was a slight step under the heels. Old depictions of the crucifixion always
showed the wounds in the palms, and these images started to be created
not that long after the method of execution was phased out in the Roman
Empire. (The practice, which probably originated in Persia, apparently
went on in the middle east at least until medieval times. Zenghi, the
Muslim ruler of Aleppo, for example, is said to have crucified the Muslim
garrison of Baalbeck who resisted his domination of Syria). So there is
every reason to think medieval Christian artists knew what a crucifixion
looked like.
The Roman Empire did crucify those who defied it.
As bad as the suffering of the crucified must have been that of their
loved ones bearing witness. The image of Jesus' kith and kin dealing with
his body after his deposition from the Cross still has power to move.
It maybe the contrast of their tenderness with the evidence of savage
execution.
|
|
|