|
|
Nefertiti was the queen-consort to the radical pharaoh Amenhoep IV. Amenhotep
abolished Egypt's the age-old polytheism, replacing it with worship of
of a single god, Aten, represented by the sun. He rechristened himself
Akhenaten, meaning 'living image of the Aten'. After his death this pharaoh
was cared as a heretic by the resurgent old order. His name was erased
from history, as were the names and portraits of those associated with
his aberrant regime. Nefertiti became famous again only three thousand
years later, when German archaeologists uncovered the queen's portrait
bust from the sands amid the ruins of Akhenaten's long lost capital Akhetaten
(tell-el-Amarna). The artifact lay still in the workshop of its sculptor
Thutmose. Akhenaten's revolutionary reign had seen the abandonment not
only of the old gods but also of conventional artistic stylization. The
painted bust thus portrayed the queen with an uncanny naturalism previously
little known in Egypt, graceful but majestically aloof. Aknenaten saw
himself as the earthly channel for his god's power, and in his time images
of himself and his family engaged in solar worship replaced images of
the multifarious deities whose cults he had abolished. Sometimes in these
images his consort seemed scarcely subordinate, indicating her central
role in the new state religion.Nefertiti's name meant 'the beautiful-one
has come'. It seems it was fitting.
Three mummies that have lain half forgotten in a sealed chamber in tomb
KV 35, for manny centuries. Egyptologist Dr Joann Fletcher has recently
made the case for one of them being that of the famous Nefertiti. While
one must agree that it is the mummy of a royal woman of the late 18th
dynasty, there may be room to doubt whether Fletcher's identification.
The mummy has suffered from seemingly deliberate and systematic damage,
with the chest and lower face smashed in. Enough survives to provide clues
to the individual's identity, however.
The partially erupted wisdom teeth seem compelling evidence that the
mummy is that of a much younger woman (Nefertiti died aged 30-40, whereas
the teeth put the age of this mummy at death at 16-20). The fused and
slightly bowed spine was taken as possible evidence of an older woman,
true. However, I find it easier to believe that this was not Nefertiti
herself, but one of her daughters, possibly Meritaten, or Ankhesenamun
(originally called Ankhesenpaaten). Spinal anomalies (fused vertebrae)
were found in the body of Tutankhamun (half brother and husband of Ankhesenamun.
I think it is likely that Tutankhamen and Ankhesenamun both inherited
mild skeletal abnormalities from their common father Aknenaten, who was
commonly portrayed with very peculiar bodily features. (Incestuous marriage
was customary for the Pharaohs, so it seems hardly surprising inbreeding
led to certain deformities). Akhenaten's deformities seems to have included
an elongated skull. This head shape is a feature of Tutankhamuns
corpse too, as well as that of the female mummy from KV 35.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A long skull is also a feature of the young man's mummified body that
was found in the (likewise much defaced) female sarcophagus in tomb KV
55. I subscribe to the view that this latter was Akhenatens short-lived
and mysterious successor Semkhare (and dont feel that Fletcher is
right to have Semkhare and Nefertiti being one and the same, she having
decided to adopt a masculine persona!) It seems more likely that Semkhare
was Tutankhamuns older brother (the son of Akhenaten by a secondary
wife perhaps- only Akhenaten and Nefertiti's six daughters featured in
the official images of the Amarna royal family).
There is evidence that the young woman whose body ended up in KV 35 (Fletchers
Nefertiti candidate) suffered a violent death, and that subsequent to
her burial her corpse was ritually mutilated. This seems to represent
a revenge attack on the part of the old Theban priesthood on the family
of Akhenaten, tainted as they all were by his blasphemy. The arm placed
across the chest- the sign of a princess or queen- meanwhile, is not in
itself evidence that the corpse was Nefertitis.
The KV35 body could be that of the oldest princess, Meritaten who probably
succeeded her mother Nefertiti as Akhenatens great royal wife, and
may also have been the wife of Semkhare. The mummy could clearly also
be that of Ankhesenamun, who was queen-consort to Tutankhamun. (It could
also be one of their four sisters who probably died in a plague that ravaged
Armana/Akhetaten- possibly even the same plague mentioned in Exodus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr Fletcher may also have been wrong also to
cast Nefertiti as the ruler who presided over the abandonment of Atenism,
and the return of the court to Thebes. Nefertiti was far too central to
the solar cult for that to seem remotely likely. In actuality the religious
counter-revolution was organized during the reign of Tutankhamun, when real
power lay with the vizier Ay. Ay was apparently the father of Nefertiti,
and had served his sonin-law Akenatens whim loyally. (Ay originally
planned to be buried in Amarna, and his original tomb was carved with hymns
to the Aten). However, as the power behind the boy-king Tuts throne,
Ay quickly had the solar cult officially ditched. Many suspect that Ay was
behind Tutankhamuns premature death, which came just as the young
pharaoh was coming of age. The young widow Ankhesenamun then appealed to
the Hittite king, writing: My husband has died and I have no son.
They say about you that you have many sons, You might give me one of your
sons to become my husband. I would not wish to take one of my subjects as
a husband (By this it is presumed she meant so that she did not have
to marry her own grandfather, Ay!) In the event, the Hittite prince who
set off for Egypt was murdered en-route, and the aged Ay succeeded in establising
himself as pharaoh. He seems to have compelled Ankhesenamun to marry him,
for a ring survives bearing their combined name cartouches. As Ay had another
queen by the end of his reign, it is possible that he had Ankhesenamun murdered
too. (Power corrupts
) If this is so, then it explains much about the
body in KV35. Finally, there is the evidence of the facial reconstruction.
The woman looks similar to the Nefertiti portrait bust, but different. They
are clearly different women, but conceivably could be mother and daughter.
The computer reconstruction may also be compared to the image of Ankhesenamun
as portrayed on the back of a throne found in Tutankhamun's tomb, and to
a statue of one of the Amarna princesses. |
|
|
|
|